Hoppa till innehåll

Economic benefits of continuous-cover forestry

Done right, continuous-cover forestry (hyggesfritt skogsbruk) can offer major economic advantages compared to traditional clearcut forestry (trakthyggesbruk). With Hyggligt, it’s also easy.

1 minuts läsning· Publicerad 8 aug. 2023· Senast uppdaterad 27 mars 2025

En närbild av en stapel huggen ved med synliga årsringar och bark.

Research has shown that continuous-cover forestry can be just as profitable—or more profitable—for forest owners than traditional clearcut forestry (trakthyggesbruk), when done correctly. In addition to higher long-term harvesting income, it can also mean lower logging operations and silviculture costs, steadier cash flow, preserved property value, and better use of the forest’s ecosystem services (ekosystemtjänster).

The harvested volume and revenue from a single operation is of course higher in a final felling (slutavverkning) under clearcut forestry, since all trees in the stand are harvested—unlike continuous-cover forestry, where only the largest trees are taken. But that comparison is only interesting in the very short term. Over a 70-year period (an optimistic rotation period (omloppstid) for clearcut forestry), continuous-cover forestry can allow 4–7 harvests and surpass the profitability of clearcut systems.

Below you’ll find more reasons—and further reading—on why continuous-cover forestry with Hyggligt can be more profitable than traditional clearcut forestry.

Your net at harvest (per hectare)

0 SEK*

250 m3sk

*The harvest net is not a guaranteed figure. The calculation is based on a healthy spruce-dominated forest in southern Sweden.

Estimate your forest

Want a more precise estimate based on your forest? Click the button below and fill in details about your stand, and we'll get back to you with an estimated harvest net.

Estimate your forest